Tag Archives: CO2

Tougher Than Tom’s Mosquito TNT review

I tested the Mosquito TNT in my Pennsylvania yard and have concluded that they do not control mosquitoes. Moreover, they kill a considerable number of non-target organisms, including pollinators, and provide a habitat for developing flies that feed on the decaying carcasses of previous victims. My full review is below. I include instructions for reporting the product to federal and state regulators, plus tips on how to get your money back if the company refuses to honor its refund policy.

Marketing claims

The company says the four-trap kit ($39.99 plus tax) will make a 1-acre yard “mosquito-free” for 30 days. At the end of this period you dump out the contents and add fresh bait (sold separately for $19.99).

Marketing materials assert that female mosquitoes are attracted to the containers because they emit carbon dioxide, which is produced by two pairs of “inert” (i.e., not inert) ingredients (yeast and D-glucose; sodium bicarbonate and citric acid). The active ingredient, sodium lauryl sulfate is said to make them drown faster.

Note that in reality the device would not be able to produce enough CO2 to attract mosquitoes, and certainly not for 30 days. And the active ingredient, sodium lauryl sulfate, is not listed anywhere in the primary literature as a chemical that can kill adult mosquitoes.

My test results

I took photographs of the four traps every several days as a way to record what types of insects were being killed. By far the most common were flies (fruit flies, blow flies, picture-winged flies, etc.), wasps (yellowjackets and hornets), earwigs, and beetles. Initially they were attracted by the sugar and yeast, but eventually the rotting carcasses attracted species that feed on decaying organic matter. Some of these latter individuals laid eggs, resulting in rather large white larvae moving around in the fluid. After about 20 days the stench was enough to make me gag whenever I got close. At no point during my inspections did I notice a single mosquito.

Below are photographs of the other three Mosquito TNTs. Like the trap above, these did not kill any mosquitoes. One had trapped two bumblebees. Although these seemed to attract fewer insects, all contained living fly larvae.

Containers are filled with living larvae

After several weeks, the fluid was teaming with larvae of humpbacked flies (Phoridae). Here’s a photograph followed by a video.

I wasn’t able to rear any of the above to adulthood but did succeed for a different species, below, which I’ve tentatively identified as Coboldia fuscipes, a type of minute scavenger fly (Scatopsidae).

Ads are misleading

Many of Tougher Than Tom’s ads assert that the dead insects inside the traps are mosquitoes, even though the insects appear to be fruit flies, bottle flies, and wasps. I.e., the company uses gaslighting to convince people that traps work even though it is very apparent they do not.

Another tactic is to show images that have been Photoshopped to falsely convey high efficacy. For example, the image below has mosquitoes that were copied from a photograph taken in Germany by Steffen Kugler. It’s unclear whether Tougher Than Tom has legally licensed that photograph.

Photoshopped illustration copyright Zachary Snyder Collins of Tougher Than Tom (from Amazon listing).

Tougher Than Tom also uses “user-generated content” (UGC) to push the Mosquito TNT on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. Users seem to be following a script that frequently includes how safe the ingredients are, how yards become “mosquito-free,” and how traps eliminate worries over mosquito-borne diseases (all claims that violate FIFRA). None shows mosquitoes inside the Mosquito TNT. The UGCs rarely disclose a financial relationship with the company even though that is required by the FTC.

How to get a refund

Tougher Than Tom has generous return language (“100% guaranteed,” “hassle-free refunds,” “If Tom’s products don’t work for you, you get your money back!“) but tends to ignore refund requests. For those who persist, company then insists that traps need to be mailed back at customer’s expense. To get around these tactics, I highly recommend posting a review on Trustpilot. The company seems to monitor this site and will usually try to appease consumers in an effort to maintain a good standing on the review site. Tougher Than Tom will try to get your review removed by flagging it for “illegal content”, so contact Trustpilot and report that, too (and contact me, please, if you’d like). You can also leave reviews at the Better Business Bureau and PissedConsumer.

If that doesn’t work, file a complaint with the Attorney General in your state. You can do this by conducting an internet search for “file complaint with attorney general [your state]” and then submitting a short form. The office will then contact Tougher Than Tom on your behalf, using legal language that may get the company’s attention. It’s easy.

How to file a state or federal complaint

If you’d like to help protect other consumers, you can report the company for making false or misleading claims.

To locate the person in charge of pesticide registration and enforcement in your state, click on this map. These people have the power to revisit a product’s registration status as well as levy fines against the company for shipping to the state without a registration. In your email, provide details of what your traps have captured and attach photographs if possible.

You can also report the company to the EPA and the FTC. For these communications it is also helpful to attach screenshots of the marketing materials that led you to believe that the product eliminated mosquitoes. And if you noticed zero mosquitoes inside your traps, mention that, too.

Here’s the company contact information to share in your report:

Tougher Than Tom
2028 E Ben White Blvd, Suite 240-1328, Austin, TX 78741
(413) 400-0067
owner: Zachary Snyder Collins
zach@simplystrive.com

Further information

  • The Mosquito TNT is a 69-cent wasp trap made in China.
  • I highly recommend reading the consent agreement (PDF) between the company and the EPA. The company had to pay $80,880 in fines for violating federal pesticide laws.
  • The owner of Simply Strive (“Tougher Than Tom”), Zachary Snyder Collins (photo), likely got into the mosquito-control business from fellow Austin resident Nick Olnyk, founder of Grandpa Gus, a company that had an identical product lineup before being sold a few years ago. I think Collins copied the “folksy, honest grandpa” marketing schtick from Grandpa Gus.

Where can the Mosquito TNT be sold?

From searching databases and regulations, I think the following states allow the product to be sold: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and D.C.

The search revealed that the following states do not allow sales: Alabama, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

However, Tougher Than Tom’s website indicates that sales are prohibited only in New Mexico and Tennessee. And the company’s Amazon listing says product cannot be shipped to Oklahoma, North Carolina (which allows sales, actually), and Maine. That these two sources list different states suggests that the company is not paying close attention to where the device may legally be shipped. The company is probably regularly shipping the product to states that have denied a registration. E.g., per a review that Tougher Than Tom features on its website, it has shipped the device to Minnesota (jpg screenshot).

Other reviews

Contact

If you have a question, information you think I should provide, or find errors, send me an email.

A timeline of Spartan Mosquito

Below is history of Spartan Mosquito, a pesticide manufacturer based in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. The timeline starts in 2014 with the purchase of a Which Wich sandwich franchise by Jeremy Hirsch and goes to March 13, 2024, the scheduled “Fairness Hearing” for the class-action lawsuit that Spartan Mosquito settled for $3.6 million. The original timeline is here and I recommend you go to that site to enjoy the full functionality. For many of the events you can click for further information such as linked documents and websites.

If you see errors, please let me know and I’ll fix them.

Boxes of Spartan Mosquito Eradicators and Spartan Mosquito Pro Techs.

Posts about Spartan Mosquito

Below are my posts that discuss Spartan Mosquito (AC2T, Inc.) of Hattiesburg, Mississippi.

  1. Spartan Mosquito Eradicator review
  2. Spartan Mosquito is suing me
  3. Class action suit over Spartan Mosquito Eradicators
  4. Scientists confirm that Spartan Mosquito Eradicators don’t work
  5. Spartan Mosquito Eradicator updates
  6. Spartan Mosquito Pro Tech review
  7. Does the Spartan Mosquito Pro Tech attract mosquitoes?
  8. Spartan Mosquito Eradicator vs Spartan Mosquito Pro Tech
  9. Yeast-based mosquito control devices
  10. Spartan Mosquito’s efficacy data revealed
  11. Regulatory actions against Spartan Mosquito
  12. A timeline of Spartan Mosquito
  13. Spartan Mosquito settles class-action fraud suit for $3.6 million
  14. Spartan Mosquito’s attorneys quit over unpaid bills
  15. Spartan Mosquito’s letter to the EPA asking for a testing waiver
  16. Judge dismisses Spartan Mosquito’s SLAPP against me

I never intended to publish more than my original 2019 review, but AC2T’s retaliatory lawsuit against me (#2 on the above list) prevented me from visiting my mom while she was dying and has cost me $90,000 in legal fees (update: I countersued the company, successfully). I will continue to expose this company until it goes out of business.

Background

This television clip is a good introduction to the Spartan Mosquito Eradicator and to the company’s frontman, Jeremy Hirsch:

Are you a journalist?

There’s likely a fun story here. Owner of sandwich franchise becomes head of award-winning, $100 million company that sells tubes of sugar water to kill mosquitoes. Inventor says, “We’ve come up with the most economical, easiest, most effective mosquito-control measure pretty much in the world”.

When I pointed out that device is totally unlikely to work, company lashed out with a SLAPP to bankrupt and silence me. A lawyer in New York read my post and used it as the basis for a $5 million class action suit (but I won’t get a penny). Soon after, separate teams of scientists confirmed that, indeed, Spartan Mosquito Eradicators cannot and do not work. Shockingly, the FTC and EPA have done absolutely nothing, and even the American Mosquito Control Association cowered in silence, fearful of itself being sued. Only a handful of states have banned sales of the tubes.

And in 2020, Spartan Mosquito even managed to get a version of its tube approved by the EPA, a feat engineered by the lobbying firm behind Brexit. Scientists are horrified. You can now buy the tubes on Amazon, where they’re marketed as a beneficial pest-control insects. Only California sees the scam and bans sales.

Will the FTC ever get involved? Does the EPA know that it’s been snookered?

And how on earth did the tube get registered for sale in the first place, in Mississippi? Answer, political pressure (the Branch Director of the Pesticide Program wrote, “I was told from above to approve“).

If that’s not enough drama for a good read, there’s pornography and NASCAR in the mix (racy, eh?). And I’m guessing that Spartan Mosquito hired a private investigator to pry into my personal life (they posted online comments about my wife). I suspect there is also a lot of delicious information on the company’s failed effort to get a foothold in Africa (all that’s left is an archive of the shell company’s website). There’s even talk of a military discharge file with highly pertinent information. And talk of governors in multiple states intervening on behalf of the company, pressuring pesticide regulators.

There’s also plenty of footage of Spartan Mosquito on YouTube. There used to be more but the company has been deleting it. I can’t say I blame them.

Here’s the sole article that’s been written about Spartan Mosquito: “A Biologist, a Blog, and a Mosquito Control Dispute” by Brooke Borel and published in Undark Magazine.

Are you a state pesticide regulator?

Please consider contacting your counterparts in states that have denied registrations to Spartan Mosquito (CA, CT, ID, IN, KS, ME, MT, NE, NM, NY, OK, PA, UT, VA, WA, and DC) and ask for a copy of the letter sent to the company detailing the reason. You can also ask the Region 4 EPA office for the “Letter of Warning” sent to Spartan Mosquito in 2018 that details why the Spartan Mosquito Eradicator does not satisfy the conditions for exemption from registration under Section 25(b) of FIFRA (i.e., the company has falsely claimed it is exempt).

Are you an EPA or FTC enforcement officer?

I would recommend taking a close look at the efficacy data (field trials, case studies, cage experiments, etc.) that the company has been sending to state lead agencies for the Eradicator. Spartan Mosquito is apparently sending data that show a 95% reduction in mosquito populations (to support the claim of 95% efficacy that appears on the box). It would be very interesting, therefore, to know how they managed to get such results. I.e., because salt is not lethal to mosquitoes, the purported 95% reduction must be due to bad experimental design, selective data reporting, or simple fabrication. If it’s the latter (involving lying to the EPA and to state regulators), prison time for some or all AC2T employees is not out of the question.

I’d also recommend scrutinizing the claim on the box (and on instructional brochure inside, and on company’s Facebook page, and on video ads) that mosquitoes will be “drawn” to the tubes. Here’s the issue: Spartan Mosquito admitted to a state regulator (in 2019) that the Spartan Mosquito Eradicator does not emit enough carbon dioxide to attract mosquitoes. Yet the company has continued to make the “draws mosquitoes” claim for years, assuring state regulators that all the claims on the label are true. This seems to be an example of the company, and perhaps its attorneys as well, of knowingly misleading state and federal pesticide authorities. The EPA should also ask the company to provide the CO2 production data for the Spartan Mosquito Pro Tech to see whether the same issue is at play (the company claims the tube attracts mosquitoes).

If you work at the EPA and know details on how the Spartan Mosquito Pro Tech got its registration, please consider reporting your concerns to the Office of the Inspector General. Did the company receive a data waiver? Did efficacy fall below the 95% population reduction required by EPA? Do you have evidence that regulatory shortcomings are being hidden from the public? You can make a tip anonymously.

Are you John Oliver?

This company’s products would make for a fantastic deep-dive into the proliferation of ineffective mosquito control products in the United States and how some states allow these products on shelves even when it’s pretty darn clear they don’t do a thing. Pills, creams, bracelets, zappers, tubes of sugar water. Spartan Mosquito has taken it to the next level and deserves to be exposed for the hive of charlatans it is.

Here’s one of the company’s commercials for the Spartan Mosquito Pro Tech that you can show and say, “coooool.” True fact: the lobbying firm behind Brexit helped to get that tube approved by EPA. Here’s another heartwarming commercial (for its original tube) that involves a guy slapping his kids. For footage of the frontman I recommend this. Or this. Here’s my YouTube playlist with more options.

You could tie segment in with SLAPPs because the company has served me with one. And you could ask your favorite Mosquito Control Board why Spartan Mosquito Eradicators are banned in over a dozen states but not in New Hampshire. You could also ask the American Mosquito Control Association why it hasn’t released its scientific report on Spartan Mosquito.

The company’s Facebook page is also worth a look. They rarely post about their magic tubes, instead opting to rile up the base with, for example, calls for less government interference in business and veiled support for truckers who use their vehicles to protest vaccination requirements. And, more recently, a subtle reference to the Tea Party featuring an Edwardian boy in a dress eating something with a spoon.

Most importantly, Spartan Mosquito owns a rather nice mascot suit and I bet the guy who built it will make one for you. It goes well with attractive models dressed as Spartans, and maybe you could get the whole gang to picket the beautiful Spartan Mosquito production facility in Laurel, Mississippi, for a photo op. For added fun, please give them signs that say, “Release the efficacy data!”, “Please hire a biologist”, and “It’s spelled ENTOMOLOGY no ETYMOLOGY”. I would be entertained.

Consider donating to my GoFundme campaign

My legal battle with Spartan Mosquito is over but I’m still $36,000 in the hole. Donations and/or shares would be hugely appreciated: https://gofund.me/fe59f642.